Read Naturally Case Studies
Case 8: Third Graders, Southern California
A study by Stacy Wright, a Masters in Education student at California State University San Marcos, found that students using Read Naturally Software Edition had greater gains in fluency and comprehension than students who did not receive intervention instruction.
The study involved 12 third-grade students in southern California who were identified by their teachers as “at risk.” The students were paired up based on similarities in their learning and academic profiles. One student from each pair was randomly assigned to an experimental group, and the other student was assigned to a control group.
All students were given a pretest to determine their baseline reading fluency and comprehension levels.
The students in the experimental group used Read Naturally SE for 30 minutes a day, three times a week, for 10 weeks. The students in the control group remained in the general education classroom and did not receive any reading intervention instruction.
After 10 weeks, all of the students were given a posttest to determine their growth in reading fluency and comprehension. The results are summarized in the following table and charts.
Control
Group |
Read Naturally |
||
|
Oral Reading Fluency* |
Pretest |
117 |
106 |
| Posttest | 118 |
128 |
|
Increase |
1 |
22 |
|
| Comprehension** | Pretest |
62% |
63% |
| Posttest | 62% |
68% |
|
| Increase | 0% |
5% |
|
| *Words correct per minute **Percentage of comprehension questions answered correctly |
|||
A comparison of the students’ pretest and posttest scores for oral reading fluency showed that, on average, the Read Naturally students had gains of 22 words per minute compared to average gains of only one word per minute by students in the control group (see the following chart).
Average Oral Reading Fluency Scores
A comparison of the students’ pretest and posttest scores for comprehension showed that, on average, the Read Naturally students
had gains of five percent in the number of comprehension questions answered correctly compared to no gain by students in the control group (see the following chart).
Average Comprehension Scores
